Verizon Wireless to Support Google’s Android

– An Open Access Cellular Network Followed by Selection of LTE for High-speed Wireless Broadband
– Integration of FiOS and LTE: Wireless Meets Wireline
– Verizon Could Offer Seamless High-speed Wired & Wireless Broadband Services

Last week Verizon Wireless said it would open its network to third-party devices and Internet applications and services. Then it said it would begin testing a wireless networking technology called LTE next year that will directly compete with WiMAX. This week the cellco said it will support devices that use Google’s new Linux-based Android operating system on its current and future cellular network.

Verizon Wireless, 55% owned by Verizon, is the second-largest US mobile phone service in market share, barely trailing AT&T, and is the most profitable. It is the largest mobile phone service to publicly promise support for Android. Adding to Verizon Wireless’ clout is that Vodafone, the world’s largest mobile phone operator by revenue, owns the other 45%.

Android competes directly with operating systems for mobile devices such as Microsoft’s Windows Mobile, Nokia-backed Symbian, Palm and several Linux-based operating systems. Apple in its iPhones and RIM in its BlackBerries use proprietary operating systems that they developed, own and control. Apple recently promised to open up its iPhone operating system to third-party developers.

Google promised that any mobile device maker can use Android for free as long as the general rules of open source software are followed, such as making improvements available to other developers for free.

Verizon Wireless CEO Lowell McAdam told BusinessWeek that once the company decided to open access to its cellular network, it made sense to support Android. “We’re planning on using Android,” McAdam said in the magazine. “Android is an enabler of what we do.”

Despite Verizon Wireless’ promises, there is still doubt in the industry as to how much the company is really opening its network. One reason for the doubt could be that the company has been among the most restrictive, the most closed to third-party devices, by creating a walled garden around the sites that its subscribers could access. Its transition from closed access to open access is as remarkable as mankind’s transition from a constant and continuous hunt for food and warmth to, seemingly, full-time search for media.

Two events may have prompted Verizon Wireless’ moves. One is Apple’s announcement that it will open the iPhone to third-party developers. That’s particularly alarming considering how much success Verizon Wireless rival AT&T has had selling iPhones. Then there’s Google’s statement that in January it will bid on spectrum that can be used to build a wireless network. Whether Google would build and operate its own network or farm it out to a more experienced wireless network operator remains to be seen. Verizon Wireless may think that by making its cellular network open and supporting Android that Google will have less incentive to build its own wireless network.

There’s also the threat from WiMAX technology, which Sprint is using to build an open access network that will provide subscribers access to any and every Web site and online service plus allow any WiMAX-certified device to connect.

One difference between the Sprint and Verizon Wireless approaches is that WiMAX gear will be certified by an industry group that Sprint does not control, but Verizon Wireless will certify devices in a $20 million certifications lab that it’s building and will control. In a world of level playing fields, Verizon Wireless would turn its testing over to an industry body or contract it out to an independent lab.

BusinessWeek reported that Verizon Wireless has spent upwards of a year considering and planning its move to open access. The magazine said McAdam held numerous meetings with the chairman of the FCC and many late night sessions with top executives at Verizon and Vodafone.

Reportedly, McAdam kept with him at all times a well-worn piece of paper that listed seven bullet points that defines what an open-access policy would mean to Verizon Wireless. BusinessWeek said that Verizon Wireless decided that moving to an open access network would allow it to continue growing but hold costs down. One of its biggest costs is customer support. Verizon Wireless operates 25 call centers, each of which has about 1,000 employees. Additionally, 20,000 employees in its 2,300 stores are estimated to spend only about 10% of their time signing up new subscribers. The other 90% is spent assisting existing customers with such things as technical support and billing issues. The magazine quotes McAdam as saying that the current business model is not sustainable. “If we get to 150 million customers, boy, that’s a lot of overhead,” he said.

Open Access
When most people think of open access, if they think of it at all, they think about what they have at the office and at home – the ability to use any PC or other device that can connect to the Net and the ability to access any and every Web site and run any and every Web-based service (like search) or software (like instant messaging). The mobile phone companies have by and large prevented that from happening with their cellular networks.

There are downsides to open access networks. If there’s a problem, consumers have to call the device maker. The broadband service only has to verify that there’s live broadband at the router but doesn’t have to check to see if the devices that are connected to it are functioning properly. Verizon Wireless’ plan for its open access approach means that it will only confirm that an open access device can connect to its network, not that every feature on the device works or that every third-party application and service is working.

The device makers will have to spend the money to support their products, not Verizon Wireless.

Verizon Wireless will test each model of a mobile device before it certifies the device for use on its network. Beyond that, McAdam said its subscribers would “have to talk to their handset provider or their application provider if they have particular issues.”

Another major difference between Sprint’s planned WiMAX network and Verizon Wireless’ current approach is that Verizon Wireless subsidizes every handset that it sells so that the user pays in many cases less than what Verizon Wireless paid for the handset. The company said it does not intend to subsidize open access devices. This would give it the benefit of having thousands of devices with wide variances of capabilities available for use on its network – without the burden of testing, inventorying and subsidizing them. That, plus the reduction in its customer support operations, could be worth billions.

Wireless Meets Wireline as LTE Connects to FiOS
There’s another major piece in the remaking of Verizon Wireless that involves its adoption, at least for testing purposes, of LTE (Long Term Evolution) as its future network technology – the so-called 4G network that would be the equivalent in speed and access of what consumers now have in their wireline broadband at home.

Verizon Communications is considering integrating LTE into its fiber-optic based FiOS network. According to Verizon CTO Dick Lynch, LTE offers speeds fast enough that Verizon could offer on Verizon Wireless’ network what had previously been only available over wireline broadband.

“We don’t expect people are going to download [high-definition] video over the LTE network, but there will be other services that tightly integrate with FiOS,” Lynch said. “This is a Verizon ‘big picture’ decision. One of the reasons I made the move from Verizon Wireless to Verizon is because there is this belief that the future is about the converged network.”

Vodafone and Verizon Wireless won’t begin testing LTE until late 2008, with a full-blown rollout not expected until the 2010 to 2012 time frame. Sprint says it’s on schedule to begin testing its WiMAX network by year-end (only a few weeks away) in the Chicago and Washington, DC-Baltimore areas.

Verizon’s LTE announcement, according to Lynch, is not a sign of an immediate launch, only a signal to device makers of where Verizon and Verizon Wireless are headed.

“4G is not about voice services,” Lynch said. “It’s not about ‘light’ broadband services. It’s about high-speed IP data services.” He expects hundreds of consumer electronics makers to develop a variety of devices that offer different functions. By announcing now, Lynch said, the telco is enabling the device and network gear makers to develop future products to a specific standard, one that they know Verizon, Verizon Wireless and Vodafone will support.

It’s much the same strategy that Samsung, Intel, Motorola, Google, Sprint and others have used to make WiMAX the world’s most-awaited mobile network.

Nortel, Alcatel-Lucent, Ericsson and Nokia Siemens are expected to be the big winners to supply LTE network gear to Verizon and Vodafone.

Verizon’s FTTH: From Ugly Duckling to Swan in One Year

“It’s been an incredible year for fiber-to-the-home (FTTH) in the arena of public opinion. It started as an albatross, a costly gamble that Wall Street battered Verizon’s stock price for daring to try. Then earlier this year attitudes began to shift. As demand for [Verizon’s] FiOS grew, so too did support for Verizon’s bold move, even going so far as to begin putting pressure on fellow fiber deployer AT&T for playing it safe and not taking the FTTH plunge.” – Posted by Geoff Daily at http://www.app-rising.com/gdblog/2007/12/ftth_increasingly_spells_succe.html. Daily is a freelance writer who is a contributing editor to StreamingMedia.com and contributes regularly to EMedia/EventDV and Econtent.

Verizon Wireless to Support Google’s Android

– An Open Access Cellular Network Followed by Selection of LTE for High-speed Wireless Broadband
– Integration of FiOS and LTE: Wireless Meets Wireline
– Verizon Could Offer Seamless High-speed Wired & Wireless Broadband Services

Last week Verizon Wireless said it would open its network to third-party devices and Internet applications and services. Then it said it would begin testing a wireless networking technology called LTE next year that will directly compete with WiMAX. This week the cellco said it will support devices that use Google’s new Linux-based Android operating system on its current and future cellular network.

Verizon Wireless, 55% owned by Verizon, is the second-largest US mobile phone service in market share, barely trailing AT&T, and is the most profitable. It is the largest mobile phone service to publicly promise support for Android. Adding to Verizon Wireless’ clout is that Vodafone, the world’s largest mobile phone operator by revenue, owns the other 45%.

Android competes directly with operating systems for mobile devices such as Microsoft’s Windows Mobile, Nokia-backed Symbian, Palm and several Linux-based operating systems. Apple in its iPhones and RIM in its BlackBerries use proprietary operating systems that they developed, own and control. Apple recently promised to open up its iPhone operating system to third-party developers

Google promised that any mobile device maker can use Android for free as long as the general rules of open source software are followed, such as making improvements available to other developers for free.

Verizon Wireless CEO Lowell McAdam told BusinessWeek that once the company decided to open access to its cellular network, it made sense to support Android. “We’re planning on using Android,” McAdam said in the magazine. “Android is an enabler of what we do.”

Despite Verizon Wireless’ promises, there is still doubt in the industry as to how much the company is really opening its network. One reason for the doubt could be that the company has been among the most restrictive, the most closed to third-party devices, by creating a walled garden around the sites that its subscribers could access. Its transition from closed access to open access is as remarkable as mankind’s transition from a constant and continuous hunt for food and warmth to, seemingly, full-time search for media.

Two events may have prompted Verizon Wireless’ moves. One is Apple’s announcement that it will open the iPhone to third-party developers. That’s particularly alarming considering how much success Verizon Wireless rival AT&T has had selling iPhones. Then there’s Google’s statement that in January it will bid on spectrum that can be used to build a wireless network. Whether Google would build and operate its own network or farm it out to a more experienced wireless network operator remains to be seen. Verizon Wireless may think that by making its cellular network open and supporting Android that Google will have less incentive to build its own wireless network.

There’s also the threat from WiMAX technology, which Sprint is using to build an open access network that will provide subscribers access to any and every Web site and online service plus allow any WiMAX-certified device to connect.

One difference between the Sprint and Verizon Wireless approaches is that WiMAX gear will be certified by an industry group that Sprint does not control, but Verizon Wireless will certify devices in a $20 million certifications lab that it’s building and will control. In a world of level playing fields, Verizon Wireless would turn its testing over to an industry body or contract it out to an independent lab.

BusinessWeek reported that Verizon Wireless has spent upwards of a year considering and planning its move to open access. The magazine said McAdam held numerous meetings with the chairman of the FCC and many late night sessions with top executives at Verizon and Vodafone.

Reportedly, McAdam kept with him at all times a well-worn piece of paper that listed seven bullet points that defines what an open-access policy would mean to Verizon Wireless. BusinessWeek said that Verizon Wireless decided that moving to an open access network would allow it to continue growing but hold costs down. One of its biggest costs is customer support. Verizon Wireless operates 25 call centers, each of which has about 1,000 employees. Additionally, 20,000 employees in its 2,300 stores are estimated to spend only about 10% of their time signing up new subscribers. The other 90% is spent assisting existing customers with such things as technical support and billing issues. The magazine quotes McAdam as saying that the current business model is not sustainable. “If we get to 150 million customers, boy, that’s a lot of overhead,” he said.

Open Access
When most people think of open access, if they think of it at all, they think about what they have at the office and at home – the ability to use any PC or other device that can connect to the Net and the ability to access any and every Web site and run any and every Web-based service (like search) or software (like instant messaging). The mobile phone companies have by and large prevented that from happening with their cellular networks.

There are downsides to open access networks. If there’s a problem, consumers have to call the device maker. The broadband service only has to verify that there’s live broadband at the router but doesn’t have to check to see if the devices that are connected to it are functioning properly. Verizon Wireless’ plan for its open access approach means that it will only confirm that an open access device can connect to its network, not that every feature on the device works or that every third-party application and service is working.

The device makers will have to spend the money to support their products, not Verizon Wireless.

Verizon Wireless will test each model of a mobile device before it certifies the device for use on its network. Beyond that, McAdam said its subscribers would “have to talk to their handset provider or their application provider if they have particular issues.”

Another major difference between Sprint’s planned WiMAX network and Verizon Wireless’ current approach is that Verizon Wireless subsidizes every handset that it sells so that the user pays in many cases less than what Verizon Wireless paid for the handset. The company said it does not intend to subsidize open access devices. This would give it the benefit of having thousands of devices with wide variances of capabilities available for use on its network – without the burden of testing, inventorying and subsidizing them. That, plus the reduction in its customer support operations, could be worth billions.

Wireless Meets Wireline as LTE Connects to FiOS
There’s another major piece in the remaking of Verizon Wireless that involves its adoption, at least for testing purposes, of LTE (Long Term Evolution) as its future network technology – the so-called 4G network that would be the equivalent in speed and access of what consumers now have in their wireline broadband at home.

Verizon Communications is considering integrating LTE into its fiber-optic based FiOS network. According to Verizon CTO Dick Lynch, LTE offers speeds fast enough that Verizon could offer on Verizon Wireless’ network what had previously been only available over wireline broadband.

“We don’t expect people are going to download [high-definition] video over the LTE network, but there will be other services that tightly integrate with FiOS,” Lynch said. “This is a Verizon ‘big picture’ decision. One of the reasons I made the move from Verizon Wireless to Verizon is because there is this belief that the future is about the converged network.”

Vodafone and Verizon Wireless won’t begin testing LTE until late 2008, with a full-blown rollout not expected until the 2010 to 2012 time frame. Sprint says it’s on schedule to begin testing its WiMAX network by year-end (only a few weeks away) in the Chicago and Washington, DC-Baltimore areas.

Verizon’s LTE announcement, according to Lynch, is not a sign of an immediate launch, only a signal to device makers of where Verizon and Verizon Wireless are headed.

“4G is not about voice services,” Lynch said. “It’s not about ‘light’ broadband services. It’s about high-speed IP data services.” He expects hundreds of consumer electronics makers to develop a variety of devices that offer different functions. By announcing now, Lynch said, the telco is enabling the device and network gear makers to develop future products to a specific standard, one that they know Verizon, Verizon Wireless and Vodafone will support.

It’s much the same strategy that Samsung, Intel, Motorola, Google, Sprint and others have used to make WiMAX the world’s most-awaited mobile network.

Nortel, Alcatel-Lucent, Ericsson and Nokia Siemens are expected to be the big winners to supply LTE network gear to Verizon and Vodafone.

Verizon Wireless Opens Up

Jack Gold of J Gold and Associates, consultants in research, analysis and strategy for companies in the telecom industry, contributed the following article.

Verizon Wireless announced that it would be allowing customer selected devices on to its network for the first time. North American carriers traditionally only allow devices which they sell directly to end users to be connected to their networks. This represents a major departure from this burdensome and outmoded policy. The step Verizon Wireless is taking is highly significant for several reasons.

One: Taking the Lead in Openness & Choice
First, it is important because Verizon Wireless wants to take the lead in showing that it can offer customers openness and choice – something the market is increasingly pursuing. However, this newfound openness has as much to do with proposed legislation aimed at the 700 MHz spectrum auctions and its requirements for openness that the FCC has put in place as it does with Verizon Wireless’ newfound “open-religion.” This will ultimately spill over to the existing carrier spectrum, especially once the new spectrum openness proves a viable approach to meet customer demand, despite fierce carrier resistance.

Two: Increase the Number of Devices That Can Connect
Second, there is a rapidly growing wave of new devices that come wirelessly equipped (eg, mobile Internet devices, tablets, ultra mobile and notebook PCs) that Verizon Wireless doesn’t sell but would like to have on its network to generate revenue. There is no reason for Verizon Wireless to turn away customers if they can service their needs. But, most third-party devices currently come with Wi-Fi as the primary wireless connection (and soon WiMAX). Those that are wirelessly enabled with 3G-network capability usually come with UMTS (the standard in most of the rest of the world) and not with EV-DO. So Verizon Wireless, by making their network open, is hoping to make it attractive for some of these vendors to make a CMDA/EV-DO option available instead of just GSM/UMTS/HSDPA. It’s unlikely this will make much of a dent for commodity consumer products, as most of the rest of the world does not have an EV-DO option, but Verizon Wireless has nothing to lose and if it can sway some vendors to offer devices for its network, it comes out ahead. Higher end, niche products could easily allow both options.

Three: A Shot across the Bow at Google
Third, we believe this is a shot across the bow at Google, who is aggressively pushing network neutrality. Verizon Wireless wants to make a statement that it is neutral with respect to devices, both to end users but also to the FCC and Congress who might be considering new rules.

Consequently, this new Verizon Wireless direction is also about positioning against Google and its Android project, and against Apple as well, with its “sealed-in-concrete” closed iPhone ecosystem.

Four: Sell More Data Plans
Finally, Verizon Wireless is hoping to attract more software vendors to develop software that will run on devices on its network so it can sell more data plans. This is a business area that has grown slower than Verizon Wireless (and the other carriers) had hoped, so anything it can do to increase data plan uptake is positive.

The ‘Gotcha’
However, there is a potential “gotcha” in this announcement. Verizon Wireless says it will be setting up a lab to test out any new devices to be brought onto its network. How long this might take, how much it might cost, how many devices might get rejected, all could have a negative impact on this otherwise promising announcement.

The Pluses
On a positive note, openness could significantly speed new devices to market by removing carriers from the “gate keeper” mode they are currently in. With all of the certifications, customizations and testing required, it can take as much as two years from start of the process to release of a device to customers. In the fast-paced mobile market, this is an eternity, given that the sales-life of a typical device is 12 months or less. Innovation and technology enhancement have a lot to gain by opening up the deployment cycle. Nevertheless, there still needs to be some way of certifying that new devices brought on to the network will not have an adverse effect on that network, and therefore some form of certification testing will still need to be performed, hopefully in an expedited manner.

Ultimately, open networks could benefit Microsoft’s operating systems (and Linux) by “componentizing” the technologies necessary to make a device, and creating a platform approach similar to the current state of the PC market. Certified network components will become available as off-the-shelf building blocks. This will help smaller vendors seeking quick time to market. Their devices will compete purely on customer appeal, not the carrier relationship, thereby substantially broadening end user choice and ending user lock-in with carrier-supplied devices.

Bottom Line
Overall this is a positive announcement, with Verizon Wireless showing customers that it is open and wants to allow them to make their own choices. It remains to be seen how much of an effect this will have on its customer base and ultimately revenues. But it certainly will win Verizon Wireless a number of accolades from the vocal net neutrality crowd. It will further give them a leg-up on Apple and Google, and its carrier competitors, who will likely follow suit in short order. However, we need to wait to see just how much and how soon Verizon Wireless will open up its networks. Nevertheless, it is a sign that the carriers’ “walled gardens” are coming to an end.

Verizon’s FTTH: From Ugly Duckling to Swan in One Year

“It’s been an incredible year for fiber-to-the-home (FTTH) in the arena of public opinion. It started as an albatross, a costly gamble that Wall Street battered Verizon’s stock price for daring to try. Then earlier this year attitudes began to shift. As demand for [Verizon’s] FiOS grew, so too did support for Verizon’s bold move, even going so far as to begin putting pressure on fellow fiber deployer AT&T for playing it safe and not taking the FTTH plunge.” – Posted by Geoff Daily at http://www.app-rising.com/gdblog/2007/12/ftth_increasingly_spells_succe.html. Daily is a freelance writer who is a contributing editor to StreamingMedia.com and contributes regularly to EMedia/EventDV and Econtent.